SC Guide

Supreme Court AI Guide for Advocates

Before you file or submit any AI-assisted content in court, follow these safeguards. This guide is designed to help advocates use AI as an assistive tool while keeping human judgment, disclosure, confidentiality, and verification at the center.

Ethics Notice Not legal advice. Always follow applicable court rules, your jurisdiction’s practice directions, and professional ethics.
01 / ASSISTIVE ONLY

AI is assistive, human judgment is determinative

AI should support research, drafting, summarization, translation, and preparation. Decisions on law and facts must remain with the court and with the advocate’s professional judgment.

02 / OUTCOMES

Never rely on AI alone for judicial outcomes

Don’t use AI outputs as the sole basis for claiming conclusions such as findings of fact/law or outcome predictions. Treat AI suggestions as drafts to be verified.

03 / COMPLIANCE

Risk scoring / bail eligibility / credibility profiling should not be used

Avoid features or workflows that compute flight risk, recidivism prediction, bail eligibility evaluation, or credibility of parties/witnesses for court purposes.

04 / TRANSPARENCY

Disclose AI assistance when required

If your jurisdiction/court rules require disclosure, ensure you declare AI assistance for AI-assisted material in the format expected by that court/portal.

05 / AUDITABILITY

Always verify citations and authorities

For every case law reference used in pleadings or submissions, confirm: the citation is correct (case, bench, year, citation format), the extracted proposition matches the source judgment/order, and any quotations are faithful to the original text.

06 / VERIFIABILITY

No “black box” submissions

If any part of your submission depends on AI-generated reasoning, ensure your final submission is supported by verifiable authorities and clear reasoning you can defend.

07 / PRIVACY

Respect confidentiality and privileged data

Treat attorney-client information and sensitive materials as confidential. Use secure workflows and avoid unnecessary disclosure of privileged data.

08 / VERIFICATION

Human-in-the-loop review before filing

Every AI draft must be reviewed by you (or your firm) for accuracy, completeness, consistency with instructions, and procedural correctness—especially for legal provisions, dates, and jurisdictional details.

09 / TRACEABILITY

Maintain traceability for your work

Keep a clear record of: which judgments/citations were used, what sources were checked, and what changes you made after AI-assisted drafting.

10 / FALLBACK

If AI output seems incorrect, don’t submit it as-is

Correct errors, re-check citations, and regenerate only after understanding the failure mode. If needed, fall back to manual research.

How JustEase Helps

JustEase is built specifically to support advocates in remaining compliant with ethical AI guidelines by providing clear source traceability and verified documentation features.

  • Find verified, linkable case law
  • Draft with source-aligned authorities
  • Summarize and translate for easier review
  • Reduce time spent on repetitive citation checks